Mediocre propensity rating for the procedures and you will manage, MxFLS and you can EMOVI
Source: Authors’ calculations. Notes: Matching spends the 3-nearest residents approach within a distance out-of 0.01. We sort the newest managed findings on tendency score (strong range) and make mediocre of one’s propensity get toward matched regulation of each and every addressed observance (dotted line).
Dining table step three gets the harmony screening to own stratification (Dehejia and you can Wahba 1999, 2002), standardized bias (Rosenbaum and you may Rubin 1985), opportunities proportion (Sianesi, 2004), the difference for the setting, together with number of observations just after coordinating. I become just around three matching tips for per survey (an entire selection of results come in Table A1 of your appendix). The latest coordinating method is effective into the controlling procedures and you may control teams. Immediately after coordinating, there aren’t any signficant differences in observable services anywhere between cures and manage. Although not, harmony is fairly more challenging to get to that have MxFLS than simply that have EMOVI while the measured of the standardized average bias plus the difference when you look at the setting. Nevertheless, the values are smaller than average fall in the area for “sufficient” equilibrium stated from the Caliendo and you can Kopeinig (2008). Regarding appendix, we show that balance is more effortlessly reached for the a model the spot where the inclination rating excludes correspondence conditions and only is sold with linear conditions.Read More