A unique see sex differences in prominent spouse characteristics: The results away from endorsing the traditional female gender character
Jost, J. T., and Kay, An excellent. C. (2005). Connection with benevolent sexism and you will complementary gender stereotypes: Effects to possess particular and diffuse types of system excuse. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 88, 498–509. doi: -.step 3.498
Kay, A great. C., Time, Yards. V., Zanna, M. P., and you may Nussbaum, A great. D. (2013). This new insidious (and ironic) outcomes of confident stereotypes. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 49, 287–291. doi: /j.jesp.
Kervyn, N., Bergsieker, H. B., and Fiske, S. T. (2012). New innuendo impression: Hearing the positive but inferring the fresh bad. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. forty-eight, 77–85. doi: /j.jesp.
Kilianski, S. Age., and you will Rudman, L. A great. (1998). Shopping for they both means: Create feminine agree away from benevolent sexism? Sex Roles 39, 333–352.
Mae, L., and you will Carlston, D. E. (2005). Hoist on your own petard: Whenever prejudiced opinions was acknowledged and backfire towards the speakers. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 41, 240–255. doi: /j.jesp.
Neely, J. H. (1976). Semantic priming and you will recovery out of lexical thoughts: Facts for facilitatory and you may inhibitory processes. Recollections Cogn. 4, 648–654. doi: /bf03213230
Likeability of your own address
Scheifele, C., Ehrke, F., Viladot, Meters. A great., Laar, C. V., and you may Steffens, Yards. C. (2020). Review the fundamental socio?structural assumptions out-of public name principle regarding gender framework: Proof regarding correlational knowledge towards the ladies management. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 51, e1–e16.
Shelton, J. Letter., Richeson, J. A beneficial., Salvatore, J., and you can Trawalter, S. (2005). Ironic results of racial bias during interracial relations. Psychol. Sci. sixteen, 397–402. doi: /j.0956-eight.x
Siy, J. O., and you may Cheryan, S. (2013).Read More