Relationships between sexting behaviours and you will relevant services

Studies were analysed having fun with SPSS 25.0. First detailed analyses was basically did, including Cronbach’s alphas and you can wavelengths. Binary logistic regressions were used to evaluate connectivity ranging from sex, years, sexual direction, with a romantic/intimate lover, SNS used, sexting normalisation and you can willingness to take part in sexting as the separate variables, and the four sexting behaviors due to the fact built variables. Nagelkerke’s R 2 is actually regarded as a way of measuring perception proportions. Every details have been joined towards the model while doing so. The study was also stratified from the intercourse.

Frequency from sexting behaviors

The most frequent sexting behaviours get (21.2%) and getting via an intermediary (twenty-eight.4%), followed closely by 3rd-class forwarding out of intimate posts (nine.3%) and you will, finally, sending (8.1%). Detailed analytics receive from inside the Table 2.

The latest regression habits was indeed high. Nagelkerke’s R 2 is actually .42 into “sending” model, .30 on “receiving” design, .23 with the “third-party forwarding” model, and you may .17 toward “searching via a mediator” design (Desk step 3:

Throughout the “sending” design, readiness to sext (OR: 8.26; 95% believe interval [CI]: 5.36-), having an enchanting/intimate companion (OR: step three.44; 95% CI: dos.25-5.25), having fun with Snapchat (OR: step 1.87; 95% CI: 1.19-dos.93), intimate orientation (OR: 1.77; 95% CI: 1.04-step three.00) and you will years (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: step one.14-step 1.63) was basically rather connected with delivering wedding. From the “receiving” design, that have an intimate/intimate mate (OR: 3.27; 95% CI: dos.51-cuatro.28), willingness to sext (OR: dos.79; 95% CI: dos.01-3.89), playing with Instagram (OR: 1.89; 95% CI: step one.16-step 3.10), gender (OR: 1.82; 95% CI: step one.37-dos.41), having fun with Snapchat (OR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.21-2.14), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.49; 95% CI: step one.20-step 1.86) and you can age (OR: step 1.26; 95% CI: 1.step 12-step one.41) was basically somewhat related to choosing wedding.

From the “third-team forwarding” design, using Instagram (OR: dos.74; 95% CI: 1.1six-six.51), readiness to sext (OR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.48-2.72), sex (OR: step one.96; 95% CI: 1.32-2.91), which have an enchanting/intimate mate (OR: step 1.86; 95% CI: step 1.dos9-2.68), using Facebook (OR: step 1.53; 95% CI: 1.03-dos.26), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.43; 95% CI: step one.09-step one.87) and you can many years (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: step 1.22-step one.66) was basically somewhat regarding wedding in 3rd-cluster forwarding.

In the “searching through a mediator” design, having fun with Instagram (OR: 2.step one6; 95% CI: 1.47-step three.19), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.84; 95% CI: step one.52-2.24), that have an enchanting/intimate mate (OR: step one.7step one; 95% CI: step one.35-dos.17), intercourse (OR: step 1.41; 95% CI: step one.step onestep one-1.80) and you will ages (OR: step 1.36; 95% CI: step 1.23-step 1.49) was basically significantly connected with involvement in the receiving through a mediator.

Gender variations

The brand new regression designs was in fact extreme. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen dos are .fifty for females and you may .41 to possess boys to the “sending” model; .30 for women and you will .31 for boys towards “receiving” model; .18 for women and .24 for boys on the “third-group forwarding” model; and you can .fourteen for women and .twenty-two having males for the “receiving through a mediator” model (Desk 4:

Regarding “sending” design, for females, determination in order to sext (OR: ; 95% CI: -), having an intimate/intimate companion (OR: 4.54; 95% CI: dos.27-nine.09) and you can decades (OR: step 1.60; 95% CI: 1.17-dos.20) was indeed rather associated with delivering involvement. To own people, they certainly were novia hГєngara willingness in order to sext (OR: 6.05; 95% CI: step 3.68-nine.94), which have a romantic/sexual mate (OR: dos.79; 95% CI: 1.59-cuatro.88) and utilizing Snapchat (OR: dos.38; 95% CI: step one.32-4.29).

Regarding “receiving” model, for women, readiness in order to sext (OR: 5.11; 95% CI: 2.57-), using Instagram (OR: 4.34; 95% CI: 1.43-), that have an intimate/intimate spouse (OR: step 3.77; 95% CI: dos.49-5.72), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.62; 95% CI: step one.13-2.33) and you may many years (OR: step 1.42; 95% CI: step one.17-step one.72) were notably associated with getting involvement. To possess boys, they certainly were having an intimate/intimate spouse (OR: 2.97; 95% CI: dos.08-cuatro.25), desire so you’re able to sext (OR: dos.32; 95% CI: step 1.58-step three.41), using Snapchat (OR: dos.03; 95% CI: step 1.38-2.91), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.40; 95% CI: step one.06-step one.86) and you may decades (OR: step 1.20; 95% CI: step one.04-step 1.38).